Bridging the Distance: Using Web 2.0 Tools to Make Online Education More Social


Poster was presented at the 2015 Social Media and Society International Conference in Toronto, Ontario on July 27-29, 2015

Bridging the Distance: Using Web 2.0 Tools to Make Online Education More Social

Abstract: Over the past several decades, distance education has come to be virtually synonymous with online education or eLearning. Non-credit Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are touted as increasing access to education, while for-credit online education offers geographically or time constrained students depth and breadth of knowledge, as well as recognized credentials. Yet, online distance education has some significant drawbacks for students who are not physically present where they are enrolled. These challenges include limitations to communication abilities, feelings of separation from instructors and peers, and an increased likelihood of dropping out. New technologies have arisen, however, that make these challenges easier to surmount.

Given the increasing number of distance education students, it has become more imperative for an institution to have the right communication tools to suit the needs of its students and faculty. Distance educators now use Content Management Systems, Virtual Classrooms, and Web 2.0 social media applications to connect with their students, both for educational and for community-building purposes. Effective use of these tools can greatly increase the level of engagement of faculty and students alike, while ineffective use of these tools can reduce engagement.  Knowing which tools may be most effective is highly beneficial for faculty. 

The use of Web 2.0 tools is already changing the education paradigm as distance learning becomes more social. Some of these tools are being rolled into Content Management Systems, while others are being used outside of them. Current students have access to asynchronous non-collaborative tools, including interactive online lessons, and blogs.  Students can also use asynchronous collaborative-tools, such as forums, messaging services, glossaries, and databases. Finally, they have access to synchronous tools such as chat rooms, wikis, and Virtual Classrooms, which can provide a range of technologies including VoIP and video calling, allow for the sharing of whiteboards, slides, and application, and archive live class sessions for later consultation. Distance education students can also use non-classroom based Web 2.0 tools, including social media, RSS and podcasting, media sharing applications, and social bookmarking. Increased use of any of these tools can help distance education students feel more connected to their fellow students and thus more likely to remain part of their program.

References

  1. Brockbank, B. J. (2003). Learning management systems for e-learning. In Piskurich, G. M. (Ed.) AMA handbook of e-learning (pp. 151-169). New York: American Management Association International.
  2. Carmean, C., & Haefner, J. (2002). Mind over matter: Transforming course management systems into effective learning environments.EDUCAUSE Review, 37(6), 26-34.
  3. Coates, H., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning.Tertiary Education and Management, 11(1), 19-36.
  4. Cole, J., & Foster, H. (2008). Using Moodle: Teaching with the popular open source course management system (2nd). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Community Press.
  5. Cook, R. G., & Crawford, C. M. (2010). Addressing online student learning environments and socialization through developmental research. In B. Olaniran (Ed.), Cases on successful e-learning practices in the developed and developing world: Methods for the global information economy (pp. 275-297). Hershey, P.A.: Information Science Reference.
  6. Krause, K.-L. (2007). Who is the e-generation and how are they fairing in higher education? In Lockard & M. Pegrum (Eds.), Brave new classrooms: Democratic education & the internet (pp.125-139). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
  7. Lee, M. J. W., & McLoughlin, C. (2010). Beyond distance and time constraints: Applying social networking tools and Web 2.0 approaches in distance education. In Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 61-87). Edmonton, A.B.: AU Press, Athabasca University.
  8. Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of learning management systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 686-694.
  9. Lopes, V. (2008).Course management systems and campus-based learning. Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education, professional file number 29. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED535133).
  10. Mncube-Barnes, F. (2010).The use of collaboration tools when teaching with learning content management systems (LCMS). Retrieved from ERIC database (ED517483).
  11. Momani, A. M. (2010).Comparison between two learning management systems: Moodle and blackboard. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED509728).
  12. Raman, M., Ryan, T., & Olfman, L. (2005). Designing knowledge management systems for teaching and learning with wiki technology.Journal of Information Systems Education, 16(3), 311-320.
  13. Rovai, A. P., Ponton, M. K., & Baker, J. D. (2008). Distance learning in higher education: A programmatic approach to planning, design, instruction, evaluation, and accreditation. New York: Teachers College Press.
Advertisements